COMPARE / PACKVIUM VS BOXPACKER
packvium vs boxpacker, measured on OR-Library.
boxpacker was dominated in 3 of 3 profiles measured against packvium.
| Profile | packvium utilisation | packvium packed | boxpacker utilisation | boxpacker packed | Verdict for boxpacker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 item types · orlib-thpack-1 | 86.06% | 90.50% | 81.84% | 73.84% | dominated |
| 12 item types · orlib-thpack-5 | 83.88% | 89.19% | 79.87% | 75.19% | dominated |
| 20 item types · orlib-thpack-7 | 82.82% | 87.03% | 74.28% | 67.25% | dominated |
HOW TO READ THIS
Two axes, and no blended score.
An engine is Pareto-optimal when nothing beat it on every axis at once. Runtime is recorded per run but is deliberately not an axis: one competitor only builds for linux/amd64 and runs under emulation here, so ranking that mixture would compare host arrangements rather than engines. Until a fair speed frontier is published, a fastest-engine claim is not one this project is entitled to make.
See every engine on every profile ↗